GO BACK TO BRIEFINGS INDEX

WEEKLY INFORMATION FROM THE COMMUNICATION WORKERS UNION
SUMMARY

Volume 8 Issue 12. Paragraphs 147 - 159 28 March 2003
SUMMARY
GENERAL
147 Branch Magazine and Website Competition
148 Health & Safety at Work Course - Stage II
149 Recruitment Week - Spring 2003
EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES
No items this week
HEALTH AND SAFETY
150 Workers' Memorial Day - April 28th
151 Stress Tool Assessment Risk in BT
152 Acoustic Shocks - Trials on New Filters Taking Place.
TELECOMS
153 BT Group - Taping of Disciplinary Interviews
154 BT Wholesale Property Strategy
FINANCIAL SERVICES
No items this week
POSTAL
155 Reversion from Full Time Contracts at Mount Pleasant
156 Performance Review of LAs, Secretaries and Engineers
157 Royal Mail UK - MDEC New Keying Task
158 Pay and Performance in Mail Centres (Mail Centre Review)
159 Royal Mail Investment in Special Delivery

ALL LETTERS TO BRANCHES ARE AVAILABLE IN ELECTRONIC VERSIONS UPON REQUEST TO THE BRANCH OFFICE AT cwunea@cwunea.org

LETTERS TO BRANCHES
LTB/152 BT Supply Chain Business: Rationalisation (Simon Sapper)
LTB/153 Annual Conference 2003 (Tony Kearns, Senior DGS)
LTB/154 Labour Against the War: Emergency Committee (Billy Hayes, G.S.)
LTB/155 Application of National Agreements (John Keggie, DGS{P})
LTB/156 Recruitment and Retention Pay Ranges (London) (John Keggie, DGS{P})
LTB/157 General Council Statement on Iraq (Billy Hayes, G.S.)
LTB/158 Recruitment Week: Spring 2003 (Steve Baguley)
LTB/159 TDS Update (Dave Ward)
LTB/160 SMT Industrial Action Ballot (Ian Cuthbert)
LTB/161 Mail Services Preference Exercise (Simon Sapper)
LTB/162 BT Supply Chain Partners (Simon Sapper)

Back to the top

GENERAL
147
Branch Magazine and Website Competition
Web wonders and branch hacks take note! The annual awards rewarding the very best CWU branch magazines and websites are up for grabs once again and as normal the competition will reach its climax at Annual Conference in Bournemouth.
Nominations are now open, so it's time to think about getting recognition for the branch editors and internet boffins who beaver away to bring you the information you need at branch level.
Editors: All you have to do is decide which edition of the magazine was your best of the last twelve months and send three copies to: Marcia Murray, CWU Communications Department, 150 The Broadway, Wimbledon, London, SW19 1RX.
Webmasters and mistresses: email your details, including the branch URL (website address) to: mmurray@cwu.org
Deadline for entries is Thursday May 15 so don't delay, particularly considering substantial prizes at stake thanks to Hamilton Bank which is once again sponsoring the competition.
This year the winners of both the branch magazine and branch website competitions will walk away with £250 in software vouchers, enabling them to improve their publications still further.

Back to the top

148
Health & Safety at Work Course - Stage II
Two Health and Safety at Work Stage II Courses have been organised to be held at the Education and Training Centre at Alvescot Lodge. All courses held at Alvescot Lodge are accredited with the National Open College Network. This is a fully integrated course.
The courses will be held from 12-16 May & 19-23 May 2003
Applicants for this course will have already attended the Union's Health & Safety Stage I course.
All courses at Alvescot are residential. The cost of tuition, food and accommodation will be met from the General Fund. Branches are expected to meet the cost of travelling and subsistence payments. Branches requiring financial assistance from the General Fund to enable them to send students to the course must submit the request with the nomination, to enable the Trustees to consider the request in time. Special leave with pay will apply.
The Education Centre can offer child-minding facilities for a maximum of three under school age children at any one time. If any applicant from your branch would like child-minding facilities, can you please advise the age and sex of the child on the application form. Further information on the child-minding arrangements will then be sent to the successful applicants.
Nominations should be made on an 'application for Union courses' form and returned to Alvescot Lodge as soon as possible.
If a member is refused a place, due to oversubscription, then indicate this on a subsequent application for another date.
Application forms should be addressed to: Trish Lavelle, Head of Education & Training, CWU Education & Training Centre, Alvescot Lodge, Alvescot, Bampton, Oxon OX18 2PY. Telephone: 01993 843373; Fax: 01993 840960; e-mail: maxine-cwueducation@btinternet.com

Back to the top

149
Recruitment Week - Spring 2003
Branches were informed in LTB 158 that the recruitment week for Spring 2003 will take place week commencing 28th April.
We are currently discussing the production of materials for the week and it would be useful if Branches could give us a realistic figure of how many leaflets, posters etc. Branches envisage they will need for this week.
Please could Branches forward this information to the National Organising Department by no later than Friday 4th April.
Steve Baguley
National Organsing Secretary

Back to the top

HEALTH AND SAFETY
150
Workers' Memorial Day - April 28th
Remember The Dead - Fight for The Living
The CWU website has a Workers' Memorial Day Page that you can access by going to: www.cwu.org/about/health_safety/memorialday.html
The CWU poster for the day plus postcards for the postcard campaign will be dispatched to CWU Branches and Safety Forums shortly.
The poster can however be downloaded from the site. We also encourage CWU members to take part in the email postcard campaign now. Details are on our site. An article will also appear in the CWU Voice.
Can I ask everyone to let the Health and Safety Department know of any activities that are taking place on WMD in order that we can give them publicity on our site.
Any enquiries on this matter should be referred to Kevin Shaw, Assistant Secretary quoting reference NS 124

Back to the top

151
Stress Tool Assessment Risk in BT
The CWU and Connect have been raising the issue of workplace stress for many years and BT are to launch a stress risk assessment tool. The tool is available on the BT intranet here http://stressassessment.nat.bt.com/
The unions have been closely involved in the design of the questionnaire and the process. In particular USRs have fed back a lot of information and comments. Most of these have been accepted but we would ask that USRs continue to monitor and feedback all issues that arise from this process. The aim of the tool is to identify if someone is at risk from stress by assessing his or her responses against known sources of stress. The individual and line manager are then prompted with possible solutions/suggestions for issues to discuss as part of a way of reducing potential stress levels.
As from Monday 24th March people returning from periods of stress-related absence in Retail call centres will be provided with the opportunity to use STAR. If this programme proves successful, BT will be looking at developing models for use in other areas such as engineering, sales and management.
Attached are the briefing documents that are being issued.
Any enquiries on this issue should be addressed to Kevin Shaw, Assistant Secretary, quoting reference NS144.

Back to the top

152
Acoustic Shocks - Trials on New Filters Taking Place.
CWU members who wear headsets as part of their job are liable to be exposed to Acoustic Shocks or Noise Interference and unfortunately hundreds are experiencing these incidents. These incidents have resulted in significant effects, for example, deafness, dizziness, ringing in the ears (Tinnitus) and sensitivity to loud noise.
The CWU is committed to work to eradicate Noise Interference and its Health Safety and Environment Department has worked with employers to achieve this.
In particular, the CWU has been working with BT for a number of years to increase awareness and seek ways to protect our members from all forms of Noise Interference incidents.
BT recognises that Noise Interference is a problem for our members and is trialling a number of initiatives. These include:

All noise incidents now have to be reported and a new Noise Interference Reporting Procedure has been issued.
The trial that took place recently at a number of call centres using a filter known as a Polaris Sound Shield and some other filters was not totally satisfactory. A new filter developed by BT Exact called 'Defender' is being trialled in Call Centres in Leicester, Nottingham and Dundee. BT informed the unions that the trials have proved very successful so far, effectively dealing with Noise Interference with no noticeable deterioration in the call quality. The CWU's Health and Safety Department will update Branches as this trial continues.
Any enquiries on this issue should be addressed to Kevin Shaw, Assistant Secretary, quoting reference NS38.

Back to the top

TELECOMS
153
BT Group - Taping of Disciplinary Interviews
Please find attached self-explanatory terms of reference for a trial involving taping of disciplinary interviews. This is consistent with the TFSE's general policy objectives. You will note that the trial is being conducted specifically in the Midlands area initially, and comments and feedback from branches in that geography will be particularly welcome. The trial will commence on 1st May for three months.
CWU will use these comments in the post-trial review and will feedback the trial report to branches.
Any queries on this matter should be addressed to my office.
"Proposals for the Introduction of Audio Taping - Initially covering a trial of all Serious Offence Disciplinary hearings attended by a Specialist in a given geographic area.
Background
At the present time all the above hearings, attended by a Accenture HR Services Specialist are formally noted in manuscript form and subsequently produced in typed format.
Whilst the length of the notes varies considerably, the average content tends to be in the region of 10 A4 manuscript pages. The Case Specialist teams on the whole are not trained typists and hours are therefore taken up in reproducing formal notes. Case time scales are continually being reviewed and there is no doubt that the production of typed notes is time consuming. We therefore recognise that this needs to be addressed.
Our position and relationship with regards to BT as our customer is obviously of concern to us and we are therefore continually reviewing our service with a view to providing an effective, cost efficient service. There is a prime concern with individuals who attend hearings that anything they say is accurately and wholly noted. Whilst there are few issues raised on individual cases, we accept that accuracy is key to fair and reasonable considerations of a case. Some time ago we looked at taping interviews and obtained an agreement in principle from the CWU and Connect as well as BT Policy.
Proposed Procedure for Audio Taping of Serious Offence Formal Disciplinary Hearings and Grievance Interviews

Proposals
It is proposed to run a short trial in a sample of Disciplinary hearings in the Midlands area. Feedback will be invited from individuals, their representatives and the owning Manager. This will then form the basis for discussion and agreement by all relevant parties."
Simon Sapper
Assistant Secretary

Back to the top

154
BT Wholesale Property Strategy
It was reported to Branches in BOB No.40, paragraph 552 of the national consultative process for the BT Wholesale Property Strategy. The first six-monthly review has taken place and the Executive can report on the following issues that were covered.
As reported previously, Location Managers were to be appointed; to date Location Managers have been appointed to the top 313 operational buildings and all 107 TECs. All Location Managers have received training on their role.
As part of the launch of the BT Wholesale Property Strategy and the placement of Location Managers, a "clean up" inspection regime was put in place. Over 60% of the buildings required "clean ups", of which 50% have been completed and all outstanding buildings are expected to be completed by the year end.
The original committed expenditure for the year was for £6m, with £4m worth of the programme completed. This was mainly in traditional areas or incidents which triggered expenditure namely, Health and Safety matters and issues such as roof maintenance.
An additional £8m has been found from BT Property Partners, BT Retail and BT Wholesale. This investment will be on environmental issues. These will be in areas identified by the Operational Regional Forums and will cover such typical headings of heating and ventilation, toilets and welfare facilities.
For the coming financial year, the Executive has had discussions on what is likely to be or should be in the Quality Plan and Budget. Management reported that the priority will be to eliminate Health and Safety issues where it is property related and to meet DSE Regulations. Management recognise that with the continuous change of staff locations it is often DSE regulations that are overlooked.
As a side spin off from the focus on addressing environmental issues, management admitted that it was also partly intended to address CARE results which had been poor.
There has been a change in approach and policy on dealing with accommodation issues. It is intended to tackle the current long outstanding issues in a number of buildings. It has been recognised and accepted that not tackling issues when first identified does not save costs in the long run, in fact the opposite actually occurs. The objective will therefore be to introduce a sustainable process to minimise whole life costs.
With regard to the presence of asbestos, Network Operations has a proactive programme in place, however that which is found by accident and needs urgent remedial attention will be funded centrally by Property Partners.
A number of initiatives are under way to look at the use of certain buildings and these will be shared with the Union when more information becomes available as to future operational and network strategy.
Brian Healy
Assistant Secretary
Judy Griffiths
Assistant Secretary (Clerical)

Back to the top

POSTAL
155
Reversion from Full Time Contracts at Mount Pleasant
This paragraph is to advise Branches/Representatives that since November 2002 representatives from the Mount Pleasant Mail Centre have been pursuing a case to prevent the removal of their members from full time contracts to their previous substantive part time contracts despite the fact that they have been filling these full time duties for up to four years. The details of the issue are outlined below:
The case centred around 171 members who were initially employed as part time staff but had their hours varied to full time because of the major changes that were due to take place at the Mount, which would obviously affect the staffing levels considerably. Management decided recently that they now had no requirement for the additional hourage. In view of this they decided to write to the branch and issued a communication to all 171 of these members advising them that they were being given one month's notice at the end of which, they would return to their original part time hours.
The branch who had been aware of the possibility of management's actions since November 2002 sought legal advice as to the legitimacy of any such action being taken by Royal Mail. Based on the legal opinion provided to the local branch they informed management it would be an anticipatory breach of contract if they made any attempt to reduce their hours in this way.
Following a meeting at CWU Headquarters the branch then wrote to management at Mount Pleasant formally advising them that they would expect a review of their position or the matter would be progressed legally due to the fact that:
a) Royal Mail's letters constituted an anticipatory breach of contract
b) The branch would challenge Royal Mail to provide the legal grounds for its proposed actions
c) Should Royal Mail fail to respond, the branch would go to the High Court if necessary to seek declaratory relief as to the contractual position of those concerned and the legal basis for Royal Mail's proposed actions.
A further meeting was held with management following receipt of the branch's letter and the branch was told management would be seeking advice before making a decision. I am pleased to be able to report that the business has since written to the branch confirming that the decision has now been taken to appoint 170 of the substantive part time staff to permanent full time positions.
I think branches will agree that the achievement of the representatives at Mount Pleasant should be commended and may set a precedent that will prove beneficial to other CWU members who find themselves in a similar position.
I would like to formally place on record my appreciation for the work of the Mount Pleasant representatives in particular, Val Pegg and Richard Bruce for bringing this matter to such a satisfactory conclusion on behalf of their members.
All enquiries regarding the content of this paragraph should be addressed to Martin Collins, Assistant Secretary Indoor Department, quoting reference number L.670.50.

Back to the top

156
Performance Review of LAs, Secretaries and Engineers
Reproduced below for the information of branches/representatives is a letter from Royal Mail UK which was forwarded by the DGS(P) for the attention of the Assistant Secretaries Indoor, T&S and C&CHD. Having now discussed the issue amongst ourselves, it has been identified that the matter is specific to the Assistant Secretaries, Indoor and T&S only. Therefore Ray Ellis has replied to Royal Mail on behalf of the two departments and a copy of his reply is reproduced below, the content of which is self-explanatory:-
"5th March 2003
Mr J Keggie
Communication Workers Union
Dear John
I am writing to inform you of the changes which are planned to this year's performance review for all LAs, Secretaries and Engineers, and which form part of a review of our Group approach to performance management. These changes apply to the format of the process but do not change the agreed policy (e.g. that for LAs the process remains voluntary whereas appraisals for Secretaries and Engineers have been used on a regular basis).
The changes to the performance review are:

In many cases, this year's performance review will be split into two parts, to recognise the impact of changes brought about as a result of the reorganisation. Individuals' performance over the past year will be reviewed by their current (or most recent) line manager, while their objectives for the year ahead will be set by their new line manager. In some cases, of course, this will be the same person and the two elements can be combined.
Line managers will be supported in these changes by the HR function, and with guidelines clearly setting out the roles and responsibilities of the people involved, and emphasising the need for honest and accurate feedback given in a manner that supports further improvements.
Performance management is one of our key tools for delivery of the business plan and we will continue to look at the effectiveness of the approach that we undertake. We will also measure effectiveness at a local level through 'have your say' results.
Yours sincerely
Keith Harris
National Head of Personnel"
"Dear Mr. Harris,
Thank you for your letter to Mr. John Keggie dated 5th March about performance review for CWU represented grades.
In order to progress the matter could you please supply the following information:
1. A copy of current forms and procedure guidelines in use at present.
2. A copy of the proposed performance review and guidelines.
3. A copy of the Group capability framework.
4. A copy of HR guidelines for performance review.
We will require this information so that the CWU can fully evaluate any changes or impact to the current procedures in place.
I would like to arrange an initial meeting to discuss the detail and implication arising from any agreed changes to the current performance review.
I look forward to your reply.
Yours sincerely,
Ray Ellis, Assistant Secretary"
Branches/Representatives will be advised of any progress on these proposals as appropriate.
All enquiries regarding the content of this paragraph should be addressed to Martin Collins, Assistant Secretary Indoor Department, quoting reference L.400.10 or Ray Ellis, Assistant Secretary T&S Department

Back to the top

157
Royal Mail UK - MDEC New Keying Task
Paragraph 9.16 of this year's Annual Report updated Branches on developments associated with the introduction of Address Interpretation and contained within the paragraph were the principal issues discussed when we reviewed the AI National Agreement. One of these being the keying task and the skill requirements attributed to MDEC keying.
Subsequently, Royal Mail wrote to advise the CWU that new software had been developed by the Address Interpretation suppliers, Lockheed Martin, to change the keying task. The new task has been undergoing initial trials at the Plymouth and Stockport MDECs and was the subject of a meeting held on the 11th March to evaluate the activity undertaken so far.
Steve Richards, NEC, on behalf of the Indoor Department, visited Stockport MDEC to view the new keying task and proposed training package. He identified that there was a significant change when compared to the current keying task and there would be a reduction in the number of key strokes per item required to process an image.
At that meeting management put forward a timetable to commence a trial of a new training programme for all existing keyers at the MDEC sites on the new task. This training module would last for four hours and management are confident that the existing keyers will have access to the retraining process within a period of one month.
Steve is now, via the Area Processing Representatives at Plymouth and Stockport, compiling a report on the training trial, which will enable the national union to further evaluate the new keying task and associated elements, during this retraining period.
In evaluating the effectiveness of the new task, the national union will be concentrating in particular on:

I would like to place on record my appreciation for the continued co-operation and assistance provided by the representatives at the MDEC sites. Further developments associated with the above will be reported to branches via the publication of further BOB paragraphs as appropriate.
All enquiries regarding the content of this paragraph should be addressed to Martin Collins, Assistant Secretary, quoting reference number L.685.21(r).

Back to the top

158
Pay and Performance in Mail Centres (Mail Centre Review)
Having received a number of telephone calls from Representatives I felt it was essential to dispel a number of rumours that have been circulating around the country regarding the Mail Centre Review. The rumours, which have no substance whatsoever, are causing distress and unnecessary concern for our members in Mail Centres. Examples of the type of misinformation being circulated are:

I have no doubt that there are other rumours circulating in other parts of the country that are similar in content, therefore I would like to make the following quite clear.
The only activity that is being carried out currently in certain parts of the country is a data gathering exercise, the details of which were advised to Branches in BOBs 45 and 46, published in November last year.
It was emphasised that the data gathering being carried out is not a prerequisite to the Mail Centres involved being closed or having traffic de-concentrated. This principle will also be applicable to every Mail Centre in the country when similar exercises take place. This policy has been published in paragraph 9.10 of this year's Annual Report, which sets out specifically the position of the Postal Executive and myself in regard of the issue. I have reproduced below the salient points of the paragraph so there is no misunderstanding of the Union's position.

I hope that the above will enable Branches and Representatives to counter any rumours that are circulating regarding Pay and Performance in Mail Centres and in particular any rumours in respect of any changes to the Mail Centre structure/network.
Branches should ensure that this information is circulated for the attention of all appropriate Area/Unit Representatives.
All enquiries regarding the content of this paragraph should be addressed to Martin Collins, Assistant Secretary, quoting reference number L.530.05.

Back to the top

159
Royal Mail Investment in Special Delivery
Further to Bob No.43, paragraph 588, published on 8th November last year, the following information on the upgrading of scanning equipment has been provided by Royal Mail, and is published for information of branches:-
"17 March 2003
Priority Services Trial
The current position is that we are poised to begin the trial at Doncaster. A trial at Birmingham will follow, using a new variant of the equipment which is expected to be on the market soon. If these are a success, we will begin deploying in selected Mail Centres in the summer.
You may be pleased to learn that South London Mail Centre is due to be equipped in good time for Christmas pressure, and we will be contacting local staff and management in due course.
Please contact me if you need any more information.
Regards
Nigel Gooch
Project Manager, Royal Mail"
No responses were received from branches in connection with the previous information but comments are, of course, welcome.
Any enquiries to Dave Ward's Department, Reference 535.

Back to the top