GO BACK TO BRIEFINGS INDEX

WEEKLY INFORMATION FROM THE COMMUNICATION WORKERS UNION
SUMMARY

Attachments or LTB's can be emailed or downloaded from the National Site
Volume 10 Issue 16 Paragraphs 260-270 22 April 2005

SUMMARY
GENERAL
260 Headquarters Printing and Reprographic Services
261 Branch Magazine and Website Competition
262 Equality & Diversity Mandatory Training for Branch Officials
263 CWU Fund for Blind and Partially Sighted Children
EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES
No items this week
HEALTH AND SAFETY
264 TUC Safety Representative Award 2005 (TUC Congress Awards)
TELECOMS
265 Network Operations - Project Rubicon
266 Network Operations - Attendance Patterns
267 Pay & Reward - Telewest and CWU Review
268 Traffic Management Act 2004 (England)
269 One IT Creation - Update
POSTAL
270 Quadrant Agreed Resolution of Outstanding Issues on Christmas & New Year Claw Back Arrangements
LETTERS TO BRANCHES
176 14/04/05 Royal Mail and Logistics Pay - Dave Ward
177 15/04/05 Romec Cleaners' Bonus - Bob Gibson
178 18/04/05 Nominations for Postal Standing Orders Committee 2005 - Steve Baguley
179 19/04/05 TUC Safety Rep Award - Dave Joyce
180 19/04/05 BT Global Services Asian Service Centre - Bill McClory
181 20/04/05 Property Moves and Changes in BT: Consultative Arrangements - Simon Sapper
182 20/04/05 IPS Guidelines - Bob Gibson
183 20/04/05 CWU Annual Conference - Fringe Meetings - Jeannie Drake
184 20/04/05 Agreed Resolution about Standing Issues on Christmas and New Year Claw Back Arrangements - Terry Pullinger
185 20/04/05 Annual Conference 2005 - Dave Ward

Back to the top
GENERAL
260
Headquarters Printing and Reprographic Services
Branches and Representatives will wish to know that CWU Headquarters have recently acquired new reprographics equipment. The purpose of broadcasting this information is to inform you that we are now able to offer a print service to branches that we believe will be within a price range that you will find competitive. Amongst the services we can provide are colour or black & white posters, leaflets, booklets etc. It is not possible to produce a price list as prices will vary dependent on each individual job based on quantity, timescale, delivery requirements etc. If you would like more information about this service or wish to receive a quote for a particular piece of work then please ring or email Jacquie Winter, Acting Head of Post & Reprographics. 020 8971 7218 jwinter@cwu.org

Back to the top


261
Branch Magazine and Website Competition
Web wonders and branch hacks take note! The annual awards rewarding the very best CWU branch magazines and websites are up for grabs once again - and as normal the competition will reach its climax at Annual Conference in Blackpool.
Nominations are now open, so it's time to think about getting recognition for the branch editors and internet boffins who beaver away to bring you the information you need at branch level.
Editors: All you have to do is decide which edition of the magazine was your best of the last twelve months and send three copies to: Marcia Murray, CWU Communications Department, 150 The Broadway, Wimbledon, London, SW19 1RX.
Webmasters and mistresses: email your details, including the branch URL (website address) to: mmurray@cwu.org
Deadline for entries is Friday, May 20 so don't delay, particularly considering substantial prizes are at stake thanks to Hamilton Bank which is once again sponsoring the competition.
This year the winners of both the branch magazine and branch website competitions will walk away with a total of £300 in software vouchers, enabling them to improve their publications still further.
Simon Alford
Communications Dept. HQ

Back to the top


262
Equality & Diversity Mandatory Training for Branch Officials
In line with Conference policy, we now require branches to submit applications for the following mandatory Equality & Diversity courses.
These courses are being held in the North East Region:
Tuesday 24th May - Leeds
Thursday 9th June - Leeds
Further dates and venues for other regions will be published in due course.
Nominations should be made on an application form for Union courses and returned as soon as possible to Trish Lavelle, Head of Education & Training, CWU Education & Training Centre, Alvescot Lodge, Alvescot, Bampton, Oxon OX18 2PY. Telephone: 01993 843373; Fax: 01993 840960; email: mtodd@cwu.org

Back to the top

263
CWU Fund for Blind and Partially Sighted Children
The Union's increased efforts to raise money for the support of Blind and Partially Sighted Children resulted in a magnificent total of £5,900 for 2004! This is almost double the amount for the previous year!
In the past we have been able to contribute to initiatives such as the provision of classroom facilities at the Sunshine School, Northwood, a sensory garden and, more recently, the refurbishment of a swimming pool. All these initiatives could not have been completed without the efforts of our members and branches and the RNIB have asked me to pass on our thanks in that regard.
Hopefully, 2005 will see an even greater result and we have made a good start with donations. In March, for example, exceeding £300.00. If you are thinking of organising a fundraising event this year then let us know about it! Our Royal Mail colleagues in the Bournemouth area organised a six-a-side football competition which resulted in a magnificent donation of £272.00!
If you need any information about RNIB initiatives in your area then contact Andrea Simpson our Corporate Partnerships Manager at 105, Judd Street, London WC1H 9NE, Telephone number: 0207 391 2094.
Donations are to be made payable to the CWU Fund for Blind and Partially Sighted Children or information about your fundraising initiatives should be sent to me, Phil Bowerman, CWU Headquarters, 150 The Broadway, Wimbledon, London SW19 1RX.
Many thanks, once again for your help and keep up the good work!

 Back to the top

HEALTH AND SAFETY
264
TUC Safety Representative Award 2005 (TUC Congress Awards)
The TUC wants to demonstrate and acknowledge the range of work currently undertaken by safety representatives on behalf of their members and the community. For the third year, the TUC will be making an award to a trade unionist who represents the best aspects of being a Safety Representative. This is not intended to be a competitive award and the TUC is keen to develop this award over coming years. The award will be made at the 2005 Congress, which takes place in Brighton from 12-15 September. In line with the practice for all TUC awards there will be one overall winner of the award.
Last year the CWU Health, Safety & Environment Committee decided to support the award and gave consideration to how CWU nominations should be made. The Committee decided that there should be one nomination from each of the 10 Regional Health & Safety Forums. Branches, Safety Representation and Regional Health & Safety Forums were also invited last year to comment, and put forward any alternative suggestions for making nominations for the 2005 Award. With no alternative suggestions being received at HQ, we are therefore inviting nominations on the same basis as last year to be submitted to the Heath, Safety & Environment Department by the 31 May in order that the forms can be checked, completed and signed by the General Secretary for submission to the TUC by the closing date of 10 June.
The TUC has requested that the forms are completed in typescript or black ink for photocopying purposes and signed by the nominee. Forms must be submitted with a completed equality monitoring page or will not be accepted. (The page is for monitoring purposes only and will be detached from the form before judging takes place).
Will Branches ensure that safety reps wishing to be considered for the award complete the electronically attached form and submit it to the Regional Health and Safety Secretary from which the Forums will decide and submit one nominee to CWU Headquarters Health, Safety & Environment Department.
The TUC's decision about any aspect of this award is final.
Any enquiries should be addressed to Dave Joyce, National Health, Safety & Environment Officer, quoting reference EX10.
Attachment

Back to the top

TELECOMS
265
Network Operations - Project Rubicon
A mid-term review meeting on the findings of the project has been held with operational management.
Overall, progress is being made in the proof of concept with regard to changes in the processing of orders received through to the execution in the field. However the volume of orders have been low. Despite this, the time to complete from receipt of customer request has substantially cut the time to deliver and complete in the field.
The next steps are to extend the proof of concept to a wider range of products as detailed in the attachment.
It has also been suggested that ultimately there will be an organisation restructuring with the creation of Provision of Service teams, the composition of which is again detailed in the attachment. The functions identified will be executed by a smaller multi-function team. How and when this will happen is uncertain because the potential of the Access Service Division and at the moment PSTs are no more that an aspirational objective.
Arrangements are in hand for a further review meeting during the course of the summer, following which there will be further reports.
Brian Healy
Assistant Secretary
Attachment

Back to the top

266
Network Operations - Attendance Patterns
Nationally we have come across managerial information on the options exercise as of 8 April 2005. This is attached for the information of Branches.
Discussions have taken place on the Attendance Patterns and the originally presented documentation has not been the basis for these discussions. The Executive team has been mindful of statements made at the last Network Briefing Forum of the need for local discussions and agreement. Therefore, the discussions have addressed the need for greater local involvement and agreement, in addition discussions on a framework of limited new attendance patterns which individuals could voluntarily request. The overall intent of such discussions would be on the basis of voluntarism for the new attendances and for any further and future changes to the current available attendance patterns to be by local agreement.
Yours sincerely
Brian Healy
Assistant Secretary
Attachment

Back to the top


267
Pay & Reward - Telewest and CWU Review
Jointly, the CWU and Telewest have been reviewing elements of the scheme which the Union had identified as being inconsistent or issues which members had identified as preventing them from securing a bonus payment.
The response to the issues identified has been positively addressed by Telewest management. This newsletter contains some of the highlights.
Processes and communications
There are a number of issues which can be grouped into consistency of documentation, transparency and access to that documentation. For example, visibility of own fault rates and to be able to query and respond to omissions. All managers have been communicated that they should pass this information to BBEs. If the TM refuses to provide this, it can then be escalated to the FM/ROM. This agreed procedure will be further communicated to BBEs. Downtime, how and what is recorded has also been communicated down to TMs; this was due to inconsistencies of what is appropriate to be recorded. Other work such as training or preventive maintenance is decided by the AOM. It is the TMs responsibility to record all downtime and a communication to reinforce this has gone to TMs; installs and service technicians will also be informed.
Routing
Routing between jobs has not been examined in detail since Pay & Reward was originally introduced. There does not exist any automated means of recording travel between all jobs, although it was suggested that in 2 years hence, the company may have a tracker system in place. The Union has picked up an action point on routing and all install and service technicians are strongly urged to assist by the provision of detailed information. The company has offered to look at two particular scenarios:
a) examples of technicians work in same location
b) examples of where the day's first job has changed from that given at the end of the previous day. In both cases the reference number and day is required and members are asked to pass that onto your local representatives for onward transmission.
Accreditation Levels
The Union had previously pointed out that even if an accomplished BBE achieves 4 out of 6 months at Outstanding, one month at Developing means that they will be unable to go to panel review for a further 11 months. The members did not consider this fair as it impacts on motivation and morale. Telewest have quickly responded and allowed one month rated at Developing in the install business. Proposals for this to be rolled out to service are being considered The Union will be seeing what the effect of this will be in the review panels later in the year.
Training
The Union stated at the last meeting on Pay & Reward that over 70% of BBEs had not been trained in the use of "Linesman" and this impacted upon their effectiveness and productivity. There was genuine concern over the commitment to training ranging over a number of subject areas. Since that meeting, Health and Safety refresher courses have been rolled out to all in install and there are plans in place for service.
Bonus
The target of reaching bonus in excess of 50% to all eligible has been achieved nationally at 51% and in some locations between 50% and 60%. However, this is not consistent with regards to regional attainment. The Union is seeking examples from members where they believe that the network architecture is influencing the fault rate and where faults are not being filtered out.
Points Matrix
Management have been undertaking a points matrix review during February and March direct from the SMC systems performance data. Architecture differences were taken into consideration and average time for jobs taken. Management reported that their findings showed that some job types have a difference between actual time taken and time allowed by points matrix, the most significant being SOLUS activity. Also at the previous meeting the Union raised free extensions being fitted if agreed at point of sale but it is not taken into account in terms of points As a result of this a new policy has been briefed to Sales. From now on no free extensions will be offered at POS. Telewest will however continue to transfer existing BT extensions over Free of Charge. New extensions will now be charged at £25 per extension, if completed within the existing visit or £50 if a further visit is required. All additional works will now be documented on the work order and not in the comments field, in order for the routing team to allocate enough points to complete the job. The only exception to this is when it is a "Move and Transfer" customer where Telewest will install the same amount of extensions in the new house as they had in the old one but all this work will now be captured at POS and documented on the work order to allow additional points to be added.
Management's position is that points could be added back to jobs which show the greatest time differential and to reduce points awarded to jobs which are taking less time. They are taking a further detailed review with a view to agreeing exact changes with the Union to the points matrix to come into effect on 1 June 2005. On the basis of the detail known so far, this would lead to a marked increase in the overall bonus levels achieved by members.
Brian Healy
Assistant Secretary

Back to the top


268
Traffic Management Act 2004 (England)
The Traffic Management Act received the Royal Assent in July 2004, the Act itself is an enabling Act and the finer detail of what it actually means in a practical way will be determined by Regulations and Codes.
The purpose of the Act is to attempt to minimise disruption in the highways as it is estimated that 10% of all congestion is caused by public utilities. This Act only applies to England - Scotland has its own Bill currently going through Parliament and Wales has taken up a separate approach and has set up a separate working party to determine its own approach to the issue. It is unclear what the intention is for Northern Ireland as there is no declared intent to place an order before Parliament.
It is the purpose of this bulletin to brief Branches on the impact it will have for members in BT and Telewest. Branches may wish to brief/lobby constituency MPs on how some aspects of the Regulations being drafted and under discussion will be detrimental to the companies in question and the impact on delivering customer service.
Of significant impact are the proposed changes to the "Notices" procedure. The suggested changes are that:

One aspect of the Act allows for a "Permit Regime" to apply to all noticeable works, although this will not necessarily be run by all Authorities. This will be left to Local Authorities to decide whether they wish to continue with a "notice" regime or a "permit" regime. The Act does limit the cost of permits to the proper and reasonable expense of running the permit scheme; Local Authorities can apply permits to all noticeable works. Fees for "busy" roads can be higher and the expected range to apply is between £25 and £400 per permit. If the current level of activity is applied to expected cost range, the anticipated costs to BT alone can be expected to fall somewhere between £25m - £45m. The new regulations will not affect the Prolonged Occupation charges (Section 74), these will continue to apply.
There will be a change in Notice Periods before works can start and they are as shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Type (existing)

 Current Periods

 New Proposals

Prog.

1 Month

6 months

Major

1 Month

3 months

Standard

1 month or 7 days

3, 2 months or 20 days

Minor

1 Month or 1 Day

20 days or 10 days

NB All except Prog. No Incursion 3 days

Urgent

2 hours

2 hours



The Act brings further restrictions designed to minimise disruption and breakage of ground surface. Any street can be 'sterilised' for between 1 and 5 years, following resurfacing or major utility works activity. There are exceptions for 'Immediate' works and works for provision however, this requires Highway Authority Agreement.
To ensure compliance with the Notice regime, a "Fixed Penalty Notice" procedure will apply for all noticing offences. All monies raised will go directly to the Highway Authority. Currently proposed at £120 or £80 for early payment; fees for Permit FPN may be higher. Assumptions are that failures will occur of the magnitude of 5% and that this will be an additional £4m in costs to BT.
This will increase costs with the BT Group for BT Wholesale and Retail, in addition there are, as yet unknown and therefore unquantifiable, to date, costs for introducing processes and systems to comply with the new Permit and FPN regime.
This concerns the Union as this cost will obviously be passed on to customers and will impact on the speed of provision of service which will have a negative impact on a number of companies that our members work for, companies most likely to adhere to the regulations and thereby increasing their costs and making then lest competitive.
However, Government evidence that indicates utility works are a major cause of congestion is limited. The only available data quoted by Government is taken from a Transport Research Laboratory study completed in 1999. This showed that the largest proportion of congestion was caused by traffic incidents and volumes whereas street and road works accounted for about 10% of congestion and were split evenly between utilities and local authorities. The utilities therefore only accounted for about 5% of congestion yet in fact bears a disproportionate burden under the Act.
There is momentum gathering in a range of telecom companies that there should be pressure applied on the Government to undertake further research to establish a realistic current view of the causes of congestion and to review the Act in 2007 to ensure the proposed measures have had the intended effect.
Given that the utilities and local authorities are equally responsible for carrying out works in the highway, there is a view that both should be subject to the same requirements. Introducing onerous penalties for utilities whilst excluding local authorities from any penalty system is not an even-handed method of improving traffic management. If transgressions from the regulations result in fines for breaches of the law, then authorities should be equally fined.
However, whilst local authorities will in principle be subject to the same terms and conditions as would be applied under permits, they will not be charged or fined, and it is solely the utilities that will feel the full weight of the new rules and penalties under the Act. It is anticipated a campaign will be mounted upon the Government to ensure that these commitments to an even-handed approach are reflected in all of the regulations.
NJUG of which BT is a member suggest that the aims of the Act can be achieved through the improved use of existing regulations rather than introduction of extensive additional regulations. The Department for Transport can achieve this by adhering to the spirit, principles and practices of the Better Regulations Task Force.
The impact on BT on known programmes to the Union are 21CN, HOAN, and Fibre to the Premises and a number of projects have been set up to look at and prepare for the consequences of the Act.
So far the known timescales are:
Public Consultation 01/05 - 03/05
New Directions 01/05
Fixed Penalty Notices 04/05
Notices 07/05
Permits 10/05
Further reports will be issued when developments occur in line with the timescales reported above.
Where possible, Branches and Co-ordinating Committees are encouraged to raise with their local MPs the issues identified which impact negatively upon members working for telecommunications network providers.
Brian Healy
Assistant Secretary

Back to the top


269
One IT Creation - Update
The following is an update on the activity that has taken place on the creation of One IT.
The process for mapping as previously reported in Branch Officials' Bulletin No.2/2005, paragraph 28, led to BT People mapped as 6078. Agency people mapped as 1938
There were 693 requests to move as a result of the initial mapping of which 432 were agreed. As part of the previous commitment given to the Union, 150 agency/contractors were exited and the company expects to be able to do more. The intent is to have those costing more than BT exiting and a further report is awaited. The above figures will be inflated by those LoB transfers as reported in Branch Officials' Bulletin No.14/2005, paragraph 232.
At the time of receiving this report, 878 had initially been assigned to the "bench" with 703 relocated to programmes; the sub-grade groups are not known but are being pursued.
Concerns have been raised by one Branch in particular over promotion freezes. This was instigated on the back of a need to currently support people into various programmes and posts. The intent is that all vacancies will be advertised internally and externally where appropriate.
The normal existing selection criteria/process for the filling of vacancies will be followed. Management have given an assurance that individuals caught up in the process will not be disadvantaged.
Any Branches where this proved not to be the case should, after first being pursued at the local level without success, escalate to Head Office.
Brian Healy
Assistant Secretary

 Back to the top

POSTAL
270
Quadrant Agreed Resolution of Outstanding Issues on Christmas & New Year Claw Back Arrangements
Reproduced below for the information of Branches is the agreement reached with the business relating to the above subject.
Any enquiries regarding this particular paragraph should be addressed to Terry Pullinger, Assistant Secretary, quoting reference 306A.
Quadrant Catering Ltd and the Communication Workers Union Agreed Resolution of Outstanding Issues on Christmas & New Year Claw Back Arrangements
In order to resolve outstanding issues surrounding Christmas & New Year claw back arrangements 2004 both parties committed to carry out a joint review. The review was to begin during the pay talks for 2005 and those discussions have now been completed.
As part of those discussions it has been agreed that there will be no requirement for any employee of Quadrant, which includes Coton House, to attend for all or part of their normal shift on what is deemed as non-service days in the Royal Mail Group. It is further agreed that there will be no future requirement for individuals affected to have any annual leave designated or any adjustment to their normal hours of attendance to make good the hours not worked as a consequence of non-service hours on the days referred to above. This agreement confirms a new approach and supersedes any previous agreements covering Christmas & New Year arrangements.
Any issues of interpretation or deployment of this agreement should be dealt with in line with the appropriate industrial relations framework.
Terry Pullinger
Assistant Secretary, CWU
Steve Buesden
Director, Quadrant Catering Ltd

Back to the top