
WEEKLY INFORMATION FROM THE COMMUNICATION WORKERS UNION
SUMMARY
Attachments or LTB's can be
emailed or downloaded from the National Site
Volume 10 Issue 34 Paragraphs 519-529 02 September 2005
SUMMARY
GENERAL
519 Headquarters Printing and Reprographic Services
EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES
520 Harassment Complaints Database - Union Policy
521 Women' Advisory Committee
HEALTH AND SAFETY
522 Dangerous dog is spared following Postman attack
523 York container safe system of work - Multiple
movement of empty yorks (in trains of 5 and nests of 3)
524 York container - Cardboard sleeves
TELECOMS
525 Accenture HR Services - Change to reimbursement
of business expenses
526 Network capacity & planning - Security
implementation advisors grading
527 One IT - Inter group transfer - BT Fleet IT
528 Operational Integrity - Brainbench
529 Proposed branch editors course
LETTERS TO BRANCHES
413
25/08/05 BT Global Services - Occasional Uuse Services -
Transportable Earth Stations and Satnet Businesses - Bill McClory
414
30/08/05 Romec Pay Dispute - Ray Ellis
415
31/08/05 BT Employee Privacy Policy - Simon Sapper
416
31/08/05 CWU Pay Claim - Implementations Issues - Bill McClory
Back to the top
GENERAL
519
Headquarters Printing and Reprographic Services
Branches and Representatives will wish to know that CWU Headquarters
have recently acquired new reprographics equipment. The purpose of
broadcasting this information is to inform you that we are now able
to offer a print service to branches that we believe will be within a
price range that you will find competitive. Amongst the services we
can provide are colour or black & white posters, leaflets,
booklets etc. It is not possible to produce a price list as prices
will vary dependent on each individual job based on quantity,
timescale, delivery requirements etc. If you would like more
information about this service or wish to receive a quote for a
particular piece of work then please ring or email Jacquie Winter,
Acting Head of Post & Reprographics. 020 8971 7218
jwinter@cwu.org
Back to the top
EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES
520
Harassment Complaints Database - Union Policy
Branches are again reminded of the need to fill in the Harassment
Complaints Database (HCD) Forms, as illustrated in LTB 450/04.
Please ensure that all reps have a copy of LTB 450/04 as it contains
useful guidance as well as the form itself. Branches may also find
LTB 289/04 useful which contains information on the Harassment
Helpline and the Harassment Advice Network as well as the HCD.
The completion of the HCD forms is part of our agreement with the
Equal Opportunities Commission and is, therefore, CWU policy. (The
full agreement can be found in LTB 292/04)
The Equal Opportunities Commission has raised concerns with us
regarding the completion rate, which we need to address, otherwise we
will fall foul of the agreement. Therefore, please ensure that any
complaint raised with branch reps by members that involves possible
Harassment should be notified to HQ via these forms.
We appreciate that this will add to an already busy work schedule for
those reps that have the responsibility for completing them, but
there is no scope for non-compliance. We must accept that this will
become an accepted culture in terms of harassment reporting.
The data that will come through to HQ will be vital in enabling us to
analyse and identify any obvious patterns where problems exist.
We extend our appreciation to all those branches already complying
with the policy and look forward to the co-operation of all Branches
in this matter.
Any enquiries regarding this paragraph please contact Michèle
Emerson at CWU HQ.
Back to the top
521
Women' Advisory Committee
Would Branches and Regional Secretaries please note that the Women's
Advisory Committee has been allocated to the Regions as follows:
Eastern - Bernie Togher
North West - Angela Green
Midland - Vicki Cornelius
London - Trish Clarke
Northern Ireland & Scotland -
Anne Robb
South West - Margaret Marsh
North East - Linda Roy
South East - CWU Equality Department
Wales & Marches - Katrina Quirke
Thank you.
Equal Opportunities Department
Back to the top
HEALTH AND SAFETY
522
Dangerous dog is spared following Postman attack
A negligent dog owner has been ordered by Magistrates to pay
£1,000 compensation to a South Wales postman after pleading
guilty to having a dog dangerously out of control in a public place
after it attacked Postman Andrew Peters as he delivered mail in
Treowen, South Wales on June 28.
Dog owner Barry Waite appeared before Blackwood Magistrates Court on
25 August and although there was astonishment that the Judge failed
to issue a destruction order against the dog, the dog was put under a
control order with a number of strict conditions and if those are not
adhered to the dog will be destroyed. The Control Order states:
- While in public the dog must wear a muzzle at all times and be kept
under control.
- The dog must be controlled by someone aged over 16.
- There must be adequate security to prevent the dog from escaping
from home.
- The dog must not be abandoned, sold or given away.
- The order will last for the rest of the dog's life.
The court heard that the two-year-old bull mastiff dog jumped a
six-foot fence to bite Andrew Peters as he delivered mail. Andrew
spent three days in hospital undergoing surgery but has permanent
nerve damage to his hand and the case is now with the union
solicitors. After the incident postmen refused to deliver mail to the
street. Dog owner Barry Waite signed a declaration that he would keep
the dog inside, and managers took over deliveries but a second dog
bit one of the managers! Police have since visited houses in the area
warning residents that they could lose their delivery service and
face prosecution if any more dogs bite postmen.
Local CWU Rep Dean Birt said "In my opinion the dog should be
taken from its owner either to be retrained or destroyed. Time and
again dogs bite postmen and the owners are let off. This time I would
like to have seen the dog being made an example of. I think it is
pretty disgraceful for the courts to let the dog remain with the
owner because the dog might well bite again and next time it might be
a child the dog takes offence to. Dogs have been given a second
chance in the past and they bite again. It's all very well putting
these conditions on the dogs' care, but how are they going to be enforced?"
National Health and Safety Officer Dave Joyce said "With around
6000 Dog attacks on UK Postal Workers every year this issue continues
to be a major safety problem for our Delivery members and the Courts
have got to start taking such cases more seriously". Dave added
"The owner of this dog got off lightly when you consider the
nature of the injuries to our member. The Courts seem more prepared
to issue harsher sentences to owners committing animal cruelty
offences against their dogs than those owners who allow their dogs to
badly injure people. Indeed the very same court that dealt with this
case recently sent a dog owner to jail for 6 months for cruelty
towards his animal. The most important thing is that Postal delivery
workers are able to go home at the end of their day as fit and
healthy as when they arrived for work in the morning. We want dog
owners to be responsible and control their pets but for those who are
irresponsible and display the level negligence that leads to one of
our members being attacked then we support such people being
prosecuted in order to set an example to others and we want Royal
Mail and the courts to take a hard line. I have further discussions
lined up with Royal Mail and the HSE on Dog attacks to discuss the
need for more efforts to minimise the risk of attacks on Postmen and
Women, and want a fresh nationwide campaign launched".
Under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 it is an offence to allow any dog
to be dangerously out of control in a public place even if it doesn't
cause an injury the penalty is up to six months in prison and/or a
fine of up to £2,000. If a dog does cause injury the dog can be
destroyed, with maximum penalties for the owner of two years in
prison and/or an unlimited fine!
Any enquiries should be addressed to Dave Joyce, National Health,
Safety & Environment Officer, quoting Reference No. P18
Back to the top
523
York container safe system of work - Multiple movement of empty
yorks (in trains of 5 and nests of 3)
Further to Branch and Area Safety Representative enquiries, CWU HQ
has not agreed, nor was we involved or consulted on the York
Container Safe System Of Work (SSOW) updates in respect of the moving
of multiple empty York Containers either in a "train" of 5
empty Yorks or "Nested" in groups of 3.
These changes appeared as an unagreed amendment to the SSOW. This was
initially raised with Allan St John Holt last December and
subsequently at the National Materials Handling Steering Group (MHSG)
meetings. Royal Mail have conceded that such practices would not be
suitable at all Mail Centres and Delivery Offices due to lack of
space and manoeuvrability. They have also agreed that these practices
must be subject to "local" risk assessment and it should
not be the case that their "generic" SSOW terms are applied
without a local assessment and input from the Safety Rep as it may
well be the case that in many Mail Centres and Delivery Offices, the
physical characteristics of the buildings internal layout just will
not safely allow such movements of multiple Yorks. Royal Mail have
agreed to re-visit these aspects of the SSOW which we have said we
would be prepared to sit down and discuss properly and consider
proposals jointly.
All enquiries should be addressed to Dave Joyce National Health,
Safety & Environment Officer, quoting Reference No. C25
Back to the top
524
York container - Cardboard sleeves
Many CWU Area Safety Reps and Area Processing Reps around the UK have
been increasingly raising concerns about the increased use of York
Container Cardboard Sleeves as they are beginning to turn up in
increasing numbers at a number of Mail Centres around the country
wrongly procured by the local Managements concerned.
It is certainly not the case that we have accepted Cardboard Sleeves
for general use in York Containers and I could not envisage anyone
from the CWU accepting otherwise. The sleeves have a limited use and
need proper controls. The cardboard sleeves have only ever been
agreed for the specific use on the Amazon book contract, following an
agreed trial.
I have complained about the unagreed "widespread use and
introduction" of cardboard sleeves in Yorks for lose loaded
packet and other traffic where Mk 2 ALP sleeves should in our view be
used. The poor lifting technique encouraged by using these sleeves
combined with increased requirements of bending lifting, reaching and
twisting, greatly increases the risk of musculoskeletal injuries and
disorders (MSDs) when sorting from the bottom of the sleeves. From a
productivity point of view it additionally slows down the sorting
process in many respects. This has previously been raised at the
National Materials Handling Steering Group and the National Safety
Steering Group and with various RM managers including Mike Eady Head
of CPC, Mark Wythe National Container Control Manager, Alan St John
Holt Head of Safety, Paul Beattie and Joanne Coy of RME.
An evaluation and ergonomic study of cardboard sleeve use was carried
out at Swindon Mail Centre organised by Dr Paul Beattie and
undertaken by Consultant Ergonomist and Osteopath David Annett. The
involvement of our CWU Area Safety Representative Tony Hayes was
obviously important and Tony did a very good job producing a critical
evaluation of the study which I have read with interest. It
reiterates the health and safety concerns and increased MSD risks
associated with using cardboard container sleeves for loose load
packet streams, stating:
- ALP Sleeves are the best equipment for transporting and sorting
packets.
- Cardboard Sleeves should only be used as short term interim measure
and then with the false base and cross support to improve lifting height.
- Cardboard Sleeve use led to awkward posture and poor lifting technique.
The use of increasing numbers of cardboard sleeves is obviously due
to a number of influencing factors:
- Insufficient numbers of ALP sleeves;
- The 'bags out of the network' initiative.
- Cost (ALPs are expensive and cardboard sleeves are cheap - MCMs
reluctant to buy ALPs only for them to disappear in the network and
not get returned).
- transportation of empty ALP sleeved Yorks is time consuming as they
have to be "de-sleeved" and nested for despatch and
"re-sleeved" on destination arrival.
However this is wrongly putting a price of the safety of our members
in my view and this point has been strongly emphasised. Royal Mail
responded with a revised proposed SSOW which was unacceptable to me
as have been subsequent proposals.
The issue came up again at the last two National Materials Handling
Steering Group (MHSG) meetings where Royal Mail admitted (for the
first time) that the national strategy for the supply of cardboard
sleeves was considered as a possible measure as part of the "bags
out of the network" initiative in the short term and said they
could be used providing the correct procedures have been followed and
MCMs would be reminded/informed of their responsibility to follow the
procedures. I questioned Royal Mail's unagreed strategy and
questioned them on what the so called correct procedures are as it is
rarely the case that the equipment is correctly used if it is open to
misuse and in this case as we know, cardboard sleeves with loose
packets can only lead to a continuation of bad manual handling
technique and increased injury risk. They have said more recently
that a number of Mail Centres (8 of them which are heavy packet
traffic posters) have been independently buying Cardboard Sleeves and
they have agreed to bring this to a halt so that any Cardboard
purchases are made centrally for the Amazon Contract. I am still
pressing them to stop it altogether and concentrate of centrally
purchasing enough ALPs for packet traffic.
Further reports will be issued in due course. Would those branches
and representatives who wrote into HQ on this issues please accept
this as a reply.
All enquiries should be addressed to Dave Joyce National Health,
Safety & Environment Officer, quoting Ref.No.C25
Back to the top
TELECOMS
525
Accenture HR Services - Change to reimbursement of business expenses
Yet again the company operations in the UK have had to make changes
to be compliant in its financial report arrangements under USA law.
The attached is the revised process notice given to employees on the
claiming back of business expenses. As originals must be used and
posted for audit, the company has accepted that there is a potential
weakness in the process and therefore has agreed a mechanism by which
photocopies may be used. Branches and members attention is drawn to
that part of the notice.
Brian Healy
Assistant Secretary
Attachment
Back to the top
526
Network capacity & planning - Security implementation advisors grading
The above function was, at the time of Newgrid implementation, mapped
across as a C2. Following a recent review the job assessment process
has been completed and the role has been benchmarked at C3.
Following discussions with the union, it has been agreed that the
function and role as described in the attached job description that
all SIAs who are at a grade below C3 will be automatically re-graded
to C3. Those being regarded will receive an immediate 5% salary
increase (subject to normal promotion uplift guidelines). It is
expected that this will be processed, with backpay to 1 August 2005.
Any future recruitment into the team for SIA positions will be as a
C3. During the assessment process, it was recognised that one of the
Scotland roles has additional supervisory responsibilities plus
direct responsibility for senior customer interface for the Scottish
region, therefore this role is being further assessed.
Brian Healy
Assistant Secretary
Attachment
Back to the top
527
One IT - Inter group transfer - BT Fleet IT
In keeping with the BT Group Strategy of moving all IT personnel
across the BT Group into One IT BT will, with effect from 1 September
2005, be transferring two individuals from BT Fleet into the Group
Effectiveness Programme. As BT Fleet is a wholly owned subsidiary,
the company is required to formally notify individuals that their
employment will be transferring from BT Fleet to BT Group. There are
no changes to terms and conditions of employment.
Brian Healy
Assistant Secretary
Back to the top
528
Operational Integrity - Brainbench
In Branch Officials' Bulletin No 27/2005, paragraph 435, it was
reported that following the creation of OI, one of the objectives was
to identify and to increase the depth of skills required in the new
wave areas of ICT. OI management in moving towards achieving this,
have invited 300 people to participate in Brainbench a web-based tool
that allows an individual to access and certify their current skill
set. Initially it is the intention to roll-out the tool to 300 OI
employees who have been identified as having key skills, the
objective being to create a learning culture within OI and also to
validate the skills assessment data that all OI employees were asked
to complete.
It is the hope of OI operational management that people will be
interested to see their score/ level of knowledge in the various
areas and how they stack up against the external world. The data
(together with their skills assessment data) will enable them to also
identify their own skill gaps and then access the L&D
catalogue/tools following LM support. Individuals are not required to
share the results with the manager should they so choose.
Attached for the information of Branches is a copy of the email
inviting the 300 key skill employees to participate in the web-based
skills assessment.
Brian Healy
Assistant Secretary
Attachment
Back to the top
529
Proposed branch editors course
A number of Branches have recently contacted the Education and
Training Department in relation to training for Branch Editors. The
CWU does not currently deliver specific training for Branch Editors
but would be able to put together a two day short course if there was
sufficient demand.
The course would include:
- Desk Top Publishing
- Writing Skills
- Digital Photography
- E-Newsletters
I would be grateful if Branches could contact me if they would be
interested in sending someone on such a course.
Trish Lavelle
Head of Education and Training
Tel: 020 8971 7340
Email: tlavelle@cwu.org